From Porsche to Polestar

MR_Y

Well-known member
As discussed in my Cayman thread, I have reasons for leaving my Cayman S and replacing it with a sports/sporty car that I can enjoy with my family.

Budget wise, this put me in the 2017-2018 league of the usual performance sedans (and their Coupe or Sportback/Gran Coupe versions) with less than 40,000km. These being:

Audi S4/5: Fantastic sleeper cars, but not the most enthusiastic to drive. Would need to step up to RS to get proper thrills, but that would bump up the price to low mileage 991 911 levels.

Merc C43: Sounds great and pulls like a train at any speed. Arguably faster than the C63 in the real world in the hands of the majority of drivers. Issues? It looks too much like a C180 with an AMG kit, unlike the C63 which has a unique look. A good car and I was close to getting one, but not a fan of the c class shape.

440i: The performance, soundtrack and RWD handing are there. The issue is that it is too refined. I tested a 440i with an M Performance exhaust. A good car but it was not as much fun as the C43. I assume further tweaks are needed (which some fanatics may have done as mods) to properly elevate the driving experience. It also feels heavy and maybe the 340i is more athletic (it weighs less), but having owned an F30 before, I wanted something that looks a bit different.

640d (a class above the rest, but bad resale brings them into this price point): A properly fast and frugal car. Build quality is on another level. Brilliant tech and gadgets. The only downside is that it is a huge car and not that agile to drive as the others here. A mature gentleman's fast GT car. Also, the Coupe has no rear legroom - a 2 series has more space.

I avoided the little brothers of the above, all pre-2019 models, reasons being:

S3 sedan and TTS - super quick with that DSG box, but having been bitten with DSG issues in the past, I am not keen to get a car that is almost out of Plan with a DSG. Also, that 2.0 VAG motor is notorious for oil consumption issues.

M240i - brilliant car. A proper giant killer and a decent (and faster) replacement to my Cayman. Rear space is also decent and handling is proper, classic BMW RWD goodness. However, I feel that it lives in the M2's shadow and I would hate to think that I could have bought an M2 Comp if I waited a bit and saved up more. If the M240i was significantly cheaper compared to the M2, it may have swung me.

A45 - includes CLA45. These cars are giant killlers, but interior is not as solid as the other Germans. Also, extremely difficult to find unmolested versions at my price point. Also, and with all due respect to current owners, the car does have a rich Umhlanga teen boy whiff to it.

After driving the 640d, I realised that I don't want a proper Grand Tourer car yet. I want something that I will enjoy on winding roads, but still be able to take my family with me on longer drives.

An RS4 Avant would be the ultimate, but priced way above my appetite.

Enter the "Polestar Engineered"....

As some may know, I have a V60 Cross Country D4 with Polestar Optimisation software (bump from 140kw/420Nm to 162kw/440Nm) that my SO drives and is also the designated long distance family car. This car originally replaced my 320d LCI back in 2019 due to changes in lifestyle. Anyway, it is important to distinguish between "Polestar Optimisation" and "Polestar Engineered".

Optimisation refers to just software - ECU and gearbox - available on almost any Volvo from 2007 to today for about R20k at your local Volvo dealer. Engineered refers to a full performance treatment applied to a Volvo model at the factory. Note that nowadays, Polestar only creates high performance electric cars that are not really tweaked Volvos - that is another story - but they still offer Optimisation software for all Volvos.

So, Polestar Engineered is like BMW M, Merc AMG or Audi RS. Granted, they are not in that same league of sheer performance, yet.

The S60 Polestar was first launched in 3.0 6 cylinder turbo form in SA in 2015. 258kw/500Nm. The car performed well but was hampered by a slow 6 speed gearbox, turbo lag and heavy front end.

In 2016, the motor was replaced with a 2.0 super and turbo charged engine. Mated to an 8 speed box and other tweaks to the suspension, aero and other things. The result was a car that kicked out 270kw/470Nm, but loved to rev a bit higher than the old 3.0. Real world testing at the Highveld showed a 0-100 improvement from 5.8 to 5.3s according to one publication (though Mark Jones only managed 5.8 both times for his publication). In Namibia, Namwheels managed to get 5.0s flat. Sudhir Matai and other journos also noted that this car handled better because of the lighter front end and other tweaks.

The other trick up the Polestar's sleeve is Ohlins adjustable suspension. Proper racing honed suspension that requires you to manually adjust each strut at each wheel, up to 30 clicks available!

The brakes too are proper 6 piston Brembos up front.

So, how did I end up going the Polestar route?

When I took my V60 in to Tom Camphor Volvo, I saw the S60 Polestar on the floor. The car was treated well during its life. 2017 with 36,000km. It was marked down given that it is going out of Plan soon. This put it significantly under my initial budget.

One thing led to another and I ended up driving the car. The owners of Tom Camphor Volvo (who personally own a GT3 RS and other high performance cars) set up the Ohlins for the best compromise, based on my requirements (i.e. a bit sporty than luxury).

The ride is sports car stiff and the AWD system is super grippy. It does feel, at first, like an S4 with hard suspension. But when you push it, it feels that a proper Touring Car hiding underneath - the faster you go, the better it feels. Yes, very insulated like an Audi S car, but there is some playfulness underneath.

To get the full sport experience, you have to dig through the menus to stiffen up the steering wheel and activate ESC Sport. Then things really get interesting. Granted, it not a RWD car and it will not allow you to oversteer into the bend, but it does feel fun in an RS Audi kind of way. It is not as fast as a modern RS car, though it feels quicker than an old 4.2 RS5. Still need to drive it more, to properly conclude.

The dealer also allowed me to drive the car over a longish distance and at speed, so that I could assess the car's poise and performance.

The car picks up speed quickly and you feel everything from the road surface. I think the Ohlins should be tweaked slightly to the luxury setting. On the M1 north, the undulations can make passengers sick with the current suspension setting. However, when you go faster, it feels smoother. I need time to learn the ways of this car before giving a comprehensive view on the ride and handling. It currently feels more hardcore (in ride/handling) than any of the cars mentioned above.

The main negative is that the engine is an angry vacuum cleaner. This is where the C43 is superior. To get proper farts, you need to keep the revs high in Sport mode. As a favour, the dealership has offered to tweak the exhaust valve, so it is in sport sounding mode always. Still not a 6 cylinder symphony, but not bad for a sporty 4 cylinder.

The other negative is the fact that the car is going out of Plan soon. Reliability on these overstressed motors is not confirmed, but a 2 year/ 80,000km Volvo approved unlimited claim warranty adds peace of mind. There also options to extend that Warranty further.

The last negative is the cost of Brembo pads and discs. Currently R60k for a full set and they wear away pretty fast in daily driving. I am willing to bite the bullet on this, given that this will not be my daily driver. For interest sake, a 2 year/40,000km full maintenance plan extension is R140k - partly due to the brakes cost. A normal Volvo car extension for same time and mileage is "just" R40k...

Anyway, where do I see myself with this car? I will enjoy it as much as I can before deciding to part ways. Hagerty has rated these cars as possible future classics and likely to hold their value or appreciate, but the SA market has its own quirks. For decently specced VW Polo 85kw R Line money, it is a gamble I am willing to take. Yes, maintenance will cost me, but that's fine to budget for. The extended warranty covering the big ticket failures.

I still have to take the car out for a proper drive. I am eager to see if I can replicate the 13.65s 1/4 mile time at the Highveld which beats a 991 911 Carerra 3.8 S by a fraction!

For now, here are the dealer pictures.Crop800x600.jpegCrop800x600 (1).jpegCrop800x600 (2).jpegCrop800x600 (3).jpegCrop800x600 (4).jpegCrop800x600 (5).jpegCrop800x600 (6).jpeg
 
Last edited:

Dr Evil

Active member
That's lovely, and not in the typical Polestar blue colour either. Congrats meneer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

AshG108

///Member
Congrats! I always have an eye for these Polestar...the black is stunning but that Blue, is striking!
 

Kaaba1

Active member
Nice write-up. I am interested to know about volvos n hopefully as you keep on sharing, I might be persuaded to test drive one...thanks again.
 

VinceM

Well-known member
I really like the path you took and evaluated a few cars. This is a selection based on actual experiences vs sentimental. Good choice.

It’s also good that you shared a different light about Volvo. Some of us think Volvos are just safe transport (I.e. less thrills and driving dynamics like the German counterparts). Good write up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

MR_Y

Well-known member
My views after a few days of driving:

The car is quick in the real world in the majority of real world scenarios. Not quite G20 M340i quick, but quicker than my Cayman S in the real world. There is no lag to speak of - the supercharger and turbocharger working together seamlessly. Also the 8 speed Aisin gearbox, while not as quick as a DSG or the ZF, still pairs well with this engine. It also allows you to redline the car and hold it there - like a proper sports gearbox should. The shift paddles are proper high grade aluminium items and add to the sporty experience.

At very high speeds, the limitations of the 2.0 engine start becoming slightly evident - accelerating from a crazy speed to a crazier speed is not as strong as a 3.0 turbo motor, as found in the Germans. This 2.0 is a street-and-winding-road fighter, not an ultimate Autobahn stormer. Here, the C43 will have the edge.

Launch control is simple. Just put the gearbox in Sport, hold the brake, build your revs to 2,000km, switch ESC off and go. My Cayman S, with its DSG and mid-engined layout felt much more brutal, but both cars feel similarly quick. Mark Jones got close enough results at the Highveld: 1/4 mile being 13.57 for 3.4 Cayman S vs 13.65 for the 2.0 Polestar.

I did have a hasty (no time for anyone to activate launch control) TLGP against a Golf 7R on the R55. The Golf R has the superior gearbox and less weight, while the S60P has more power and torque on tap. Given the conditions on the day, it played into my favour. If there was time to activate launch control beforehand, the Golf R may have won the short sprint.

The car rides on the firm side but enjoys being hustled at speed. It definitely feels more "feelsome" than a C43 or 440i, and definitely more alive than the S4. The dealership adjusted the Ohlins (these are manually adjustable, no electronics here) to be the best compromise for occasional traffic/commute driving but more spirited, winding roads driving. I like how the car stays flat even at high speed in bends, but you can still feel what is happening under you. If I were to daily the car everyday (which I don't intend doing, with my Ford EcoSport fulfilling that role), I would tweak the settings to be softer. Regarding body control, even though the car rides firm, the car is not upset by mid-corner bumps, which I felt upset the C43 a bit.

Polestar Ohlins - manually adjustable
222.JPG

The steering is okay for a sports sedan. Like most electric setups, there is a slight deadspot (i.e. no feel) around the straight ahead point. However, when pushing it in bends, it does communicate better than a C43 or a 440i (please excuse me using these as comparisons - only because I drove them fairly recently before the S60). There is a setting to firm up the steering wheel feel and while it is artificial it does ensure that you have a nice firm steering feel at high speed.

The seats are combination of Nubuck (non-synthetic Alcantara) and very soft black leather. The manual says to not apply any leather products to these seats. They look and feel fantastic, though I can imagine that the Nubuck sections will be very hard to clean - so no eating allowed in this car. Side bolstering is great and the Nubuck prevents you sliding around in the bends

The car was optioned with a space saver spare wheel which eats into the boot space and renders this car fairly useless as a long distance family car. Interestingly, the massive Brembos upfront mean that the spare wheel cannot fit there - so one needs to swop the rear and front wheels and fit the spare on the rear, if you had a front puncture.

The exhaust is not bad for a turbo 4-pot. However, the car does make some interesting noises as you boot it - the supercharger whine, followed by the burps/farts from the exhaust when changing gears is pretty good. The dealer removed the exhaust control valve/flap, so the car stays in sports exhaust mode all the time.

I enjoy the sleeper nature of the car. I passed 2 roadblocks since owning this car and was not stopped. Similarly, it feels good scaring hot hatch drivers who underestimate this car :)

Next up, I have full frontal VPS and ceramic coating planned. I may also 15% tint to the rear windows, with maybe 20% on the front. Then, it's time for a long drive out of town.

The final service under Plan will be in October and I will be keen to ensure that any niggles I pick up are sorted by then.

I did take an extended 2 year/180,000km warranty that will cover me for the big ticket items thereafter (warranty from Volvo, underwritten by Innovation).

One last point - fuel consumption is bad - long term average on the car is 14.0 litres per 100km. In my time with the car, with some drives on the highway, I am averaging 12.7. But, it seems worth it for the performance.
 
Last edited:

Eust

Well-known member
Top spec stuff.
This car out of plan could be hellishly pricey given the type of kit on it, I assume. And likely not a good resale either?
 

MR_Y

Well-known member
Top spec stuff.
This car out of plan could be hellishly pricey given the type of kit on it, I assume. And likely not a good resale either?
A bit of a gamble yes. But one gamble I am willing to take.

Maintenance costs may be high, but given what I paid for the car, I am willing to take on that cost. Also, this is not a daily driver, so wear and tear should be manageable.

On resale, I doubt it will drop significantly. The car is already 5 years old and took a decent wack on depreciation. But nothing is guaranteed in life, so will see how it goes...
 

Eust

Well-known member
Nice, since you got it at a good price is a good shot.
Enjoy it, seems like a top car to daily even though TBH.
 
Top